Abstract

Robotic surgery systems were introduced recently to deal with the basic disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery. However, working with these systems may lead to time loss due to additional robot-specific tasks, such as set-up of equipment and sterile draping of the system. To evaluate loss of time in robot-assisted surgery, we compared 10 robot-assisted cholecystectomies to 10 laparoscopic procedures by the standard technique. The robot-assisted procedures were performed with the ‘da Vinci’ robotic telemanipulation system. The total time at the operating theatre was scored and divided in a preoperative, operative and postoperative phase. These phases were further divided in smaller time frames to precisely define moments of time-loss. Although the median total operating theatre time was longer in the robotic procedures, this difference was not significant (144 versus 199 minutes, p=0,131). The preoperative phase was the single phase to cause time-loss due to three significantly longer time frames: set-up of equipment, preparation of materials and sterile draping. In the operative phase, the trocar entry time frame was longer in robot-assisted cases than in standard procedures. Additionally, postoperative theatre clearing was longer in the robot-assisted cases. In conclusion, robot-assisted surgery leads to time-loss during preparation of routine laparoscopic procedures.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call