Evaluation of the Use of the 12 Bands vs. NDVI from Sentinel-2 Images for Crop Identification.

Abstract

Today, machine learning applied to remote sensing data is used for crop detection. This makes it possible to not only monitor crops but also to detect pests, a lack of irrigation, or other problems. For systems that require high accuracy in crop identification, a large amount of data is required to generate reliable models. The more plots of and data on crop evolution used over time, the more reliable the models. Here, a study has been carried out to analyse neural network models trained with the Sentinel satellite's 12 bands, compared to models that only use the NDVI, in order to choose the most suitable model in terms of the amount of storage, calculation time, accuracy, and precision. This study achieved a training time gain of 59.35% for NDVI models compared with 12-band models; however, models based on 12-band values are 1.96% more accurate than those trained with the NDVI alone when it comes to making predictions. The findings of this study could be of great interest to administrations, businesses, land managers, and researchers who use satellite image data mining techniques and wish to design an efficient system, particularly one with limited storage capacity and response times.