Abstract

Cerebral visual impairment (CVI) is a leading cause of visual impairment in children in developed countries, but diagnostic tools to detect CVI are limited. We sought to analyze the visual acuity of children with CVI as assessed by visual evoked potentials (VEPs) and preferential looking test (PLT) to determine whether the relationship between the visual outcomes on these two testing methods may serve as a biomarker of CVI. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CVI and at least one ophthalmological assessment with visual acuity measured by VEP and PLT. Of the 218 patients included in the study, the most common condition associated with CVI was an underlying genetic disorder (36%, 79/218). Treatment for seizures occurred in the majority of the entire cohort of patients (80%, 175/218). Ophthalmic comorbidities included retinal disease in 23 patients, optic nerve disease in 68 patients, nystagmus in 78 patients, and strabismus in 176 patients. When assessed by either VEP or PLT, visual acuity in children with CVI fell below expected norms. At initial and final presentations, VEP acuity exceeded PLT acuity by one or more octaves, and this difference was greater than expected compared with normal visual development. We propose utilizing this quantifiable disparity between VEP and PLT as a biomarker of CVI.

Highlights

  • Cerebral visual impairment (CVI) is a leading cause of visual impairment in children in developed countries (Afshari et al, 2001; Good et al, 2001; Hoyt, 2003)

  • We found that in comparison to normal development, patients with CVI had worse visual acuities when assessed by either method

  • SVEP acuity was better than PL acuity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cerebral visual impairment (CVI) is a leading cause of visual impairment in children in developed countries (Afshari et al, 2001; Good et al, 2001; Hoyt, 2003). The purpose of this study was to compare visual measures in children with CVI using two reliable and validated methods of testing grating visual acuity: visual evoked potential (VEP) and preferential looking test (PLT; Birch and Bane, 1991; Bane and Birch, 1992; Good, 2001). PLT requires that the child recognize the stimulus and process and act on this detection by making a saccadic eye movement toward the stimulus (Hamilton et al, 2021) Based on this inherent difference in methodology, we hypothesize that children with CVI would exhibit reduced visual acuity measures.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call