Abstract

Ocean ambient levels have increased in the last decades, especially in the low-frequency domain (under 500 Hz). This increase is partly due to underwater radiated noise (URN) from commercial ships. Excessive URN harms marine life and is, therefore, considered a pollution that needs to be reduced. At low speeds, machinery is the primary noise source on ships. Mitigation technologies exist to limit machinery’s contribution to URN. While implementing these technologies is costly, a lack of quantitative data regarding their exact performances usually results in limited concrete ship applications since the cost-to-benefit ratio is imprecise. This study aims to quantify better the performance of standard noise mitigation technologies using a small-scale ship-like structure in a water basin. The basin’s acoustic field is first characterized with and without the structure. The structure is then equipped with different mitigation technologies. A loudspeaker and a vibration shaker are fed with pink noise or measured signals on actual machinery. Hydrophones, microphones, accelerometers, and force sensors measure the response in the basin and on the structure. The performance of each tested technology is evaluated and ranked in terms of URN reduction. The relative contributions of airborne and structure-borne transmission paths on URN are also examined.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call