Evaluation of the non-compliance with grouping guidelines which may lead to “wrong blood in tube”, an observational study and risk factor analysis

Abstract

BackgroundIn France, blood group determination requires the completion of two samples collected at two different times to detect identity mistake and “wrong blood in tube”. The aims of the present study were: (1) to evaluate the compliance with guidelines and (2) to identify risk factors of non-compliance. Materials and methodsSamples for ABO group determination collected between January 1st and December 15th, 2013 in the University hospital of Nîmes, France were analyzed. An ABO group determination demand was considered non-compliant if more than one tube arrived in the laboratory within ten minutes apart. Between May 1st and June 30th 2014, a self-administered questionnaire was offered to the nurses of the hospital on a random day for each service during this period. The aim was to validate the non-compliance criterion and the identification of risk factors using logistic regression. ResultsAmong the 16,450 analyzed blood samples, the overall compliance rate was 65.1%. Lower compliance rates were found in the surgical services. Independent risk factors for wrong practice were work overload, surgical service and individual intermediate transfusion frequency. DiscussionMore than one third of ABO group determinations did not follow national recommendations, which induces a substantial risk of “wrong blood in tube” and group error. The study revealed major variations among hospital services. Identification of risk factors allows targeted corrective actions.