Abstract

Abstract. In order to provide a scientific base to the NeQuick characterisation under disturbed conditions, the comparison of its performance for quiet and storm days is investigated in the southern mid-latitude. This investigation was realised using the two versions of the NeQuick model which were adapted to local and storm-specific response by using the critical frequency of the F2 layer (foF2) and the propagation factor (M(3000)F2) derived from three South African ionosonde measurements, Hermanus (34.40∘ S, 19.20∘ E), Grahamstown (33.30∘ S, 26.50∘ E) and Louisvale (28.50∘ S, 21.20∘ E). The number of free electrons contained within a 1 m squared column section known as total electron content (TEC) is a widely used ionospheric parameter to estimate its impact on the radio signal passing through. In this study, the TEC derived from the adapted NeQuick version is compared with observed TEC derived from Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data from co-located or nearby GNSS dual-frequency receivers. The Hermanus K-index is used to select all the disturbed days (K-index ≥ 5) upon moving from low to high solar activity (from 2009 to 2012). For each disturbed day, a quiet reference day of the same month was chosen for the investigation. The study reveals that the NeQuick model shows similar reliability for both magnetic quiet and disturbed conditions, but its accuracy is affected by the solar activity. The model is much better for moderate solar activity epochs (2009 and 2010), while it exhibits a discrepancy with observations during high solar activity epochs. For instance in Hermanus, the difference between GPS TEC and NeQuick TEC (ΔTEC) is generally lower than 10 TECu in 2009, and it sometimes reaches 20 TECu in 2011 and 2012. It is also noticed that NeQuick 2 is more accurate than NeQuick 1, with an improvement in TEC estimation more significant for the high solar activity epochs. The improvement realised in the latest version of NeQuick is more than 15 % and sometimes reaches 50 %. Keywords. Ionosphere (mid-latitude ionosphere; modelling and forecasting)

Highlights

  • The accuracy of the Global Positioning System (GPS) in particular and the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) in general is affected by several factors such as the troposphere, multipath and the ionosphere

  • The daily rms values reveal that the total electron content (TEC) delivered using NeQuick 2 is closer to GPS TEC than NeQuick 1 TEC since for each day in 2010, RMS2 is smaller than RMS1

  • In order to carry out this investigation, the TEC modelled was compared by means of the two versions of NeQuick with the TEC derived from the GPS observations from the same location under different geomagnetic and solar conditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The accuracy of the Global Positioning System (GPS) in particular and the GNSS in general is affected by several factors such as the troposphere, multipath and the ionosphere. Ahoua et al.: Evaluation of the NeQuick model over South Africa nal frequency in Hz, α = 40.3 × 1016 and TEC in TECu (1 TECu = 1016 electrons m−2). NeQuick is regularly evaluated regarding its dependence on different parameters which affect the ionosphere such as the geographic (or geomagnetic) coordinates, the solar activity, the season and the time of day.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call