Abstract

BackgroundTimely decision-making regarding intensive care unit (ICU) admission for children with pneumonia is crucial for a better prognosis. Despite attempts to establish a guideline or triage system for evaluating ICU care needs, no clinically applicable paradigm is available.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to develop machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict ICU care needs for pediatric pneumonia patients within 24 hours of admission, evaluate their performance, and identify clinical indices for making decisions for pediatric pneumonia patients.MethodsPneumonia patients admitted to National Taiwan University Hospital from January 2010 to December 2019 aged under 18 years were enrolled. Their underlying diseases, clinical manifestations, and laboratory data at admission were collected. The outcome of interest was ICU transfer within 24 hours of hospitalization. We compared clinically relevant features between early ICU transfer patients and patients without ICU care. ML algorithms were developed to predict ICU admission. The performance of the algorithms was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and average precision. The relative feature importance of the best-performing algorithm was compared with physician-rated feature importance for explainability.ResultsA total of 8464 pediatric hospitalizations due to pneumonia were recorded, and 1166 (1166/8464, 13.8%) hospitalized patients were transferred to the ICU within 24 hours. Early ICU transfer patients were younger (P<.001), had higher rates of underlying diseases (eg, cardiovascular, neuropsychological, and congenital anomaly/genetic disorders; P<.001), had abnormal laboratory data, had higher pulse rates (P<.001), had higher breath rates (P<.001), had lower oxygen saturation (P<.001), and had lower peak body temperature (P<.001) at admission than patients without ICU transfer. The random forest (RF) algorithm achieved the best performance (sensitivity 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.95; specificity 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.95; AUC 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-0.99; and average precision 0.93, 95% CI 0.90-0.96). The lowest systolic blood pressure and presence of cardiovascular and neuropsychological diseases ranked in the top 10 in both RF relative feature importance and clinician judgment.ConclusionsThe ML approach could provide a clinically applicable triage algorithm and identify important clinical indices, such as age, underlying diseases, abnormal vital signs, and laboratory data for evaluating the need for intensive care in children with pneumonia.

Highlights

  • Despite recent advances in vaccine development, pneumonia remains a major cause of hospitalization and mortality in children in Taiwan and worldwide [1,2]

  • The community-acquired pneumonia management guidelines from the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America [6] recommend that pediatric patients who need ventilation, have low blood pressure, or have low oxygen saturation be admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for pneumonia

  • The random forest (RF) model achieved the best performance in identifying patients transferred to the ICU within 24 hours after admission (AUC 0.987, 95% CI 0.981-0.992) compared with the extreme-gradient boosting (XGB) model (AUC 0.982, 95% CI 0.972-0.990) and logistic regression model (AUC 0.885, 95% CI 0.863-0.908)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite recent advances in vaccine development, pneumonia remains a major cause of hospitalization and mortality in children in Taiwan and worldwide [1,2]. A modified version of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score for children used vital signs (blood pressure, oxygen saturation), laboratory data (creatinine, platelet count), and medications to evaluate the risk of in-hospital mortality [8]. Other scoring systems, such as the Pediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) and Pediatric Advanced Warning Score, have been proposed to assist the evaluation of deterioration of pediatric inpatients [9,10,11]. Despite attempts to establish a guideline or triage system for evaluating ICU care needs, no clinically applicable paradigm is available

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call