Abstract

Storage systems are typically designed using cold-formed profiles, with the columns of the system consisting of rack-type sections perforated along their entire length. These columns are subjected to compression, and their failure can be caused by local, distortional, or global instabilities, which can act individually or in combination, resulting in local–global (L–G), local–distortional (L–D), distortional–global (D–G), and local–distortional–global (L–G–D) interactions. However, the interactions with distortional buckling are not yet fully understood, particularly in the case of rack sections with perforations. Unlike cold-formed profiles without holes, which are covered by standards and can be calculated by analytical methods, rack sections with perforations always require testing, and no analytical procedure is recommended. Therefore, an extensive parametric study developed through numerical simulations via ABAQUS software was performed to evaluate the interactions between D–G-type buckling in perforated rack profile columns. A total of 3055 post-buckling analyses were developed with previously selected columns via buckling analysis, where D–G interactions were verified. Finally, the direct strength method (DSM) was used, and its results were compared with those obtained by non-linear analysis. The DSM presented significant variability in the results, and a new DSM-based equation was proposed for each boundary condition.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.