Abstract

Abstract The topic of competitiveness is becoming increasingly significant in the context of modern economics. Considering intensive processes of globalisation alongside with competitive pressure amongst the countries, competitiveness has become a necessary condition for successful economic and social development of any country. Only by creating, enforcing and maintaining international competitiveness of the country, rapid economic growth during the long term is achievable. Amongst the other urgent issues, the European Union (further the EU) public policies are also focused on competitiveness. After the failure to implement the Lisbon strategy and become “the most dynamic and competitive knowledge-based economy”, the EU declared its new competitiveness aims in the long-term strategy Europe 2020. Promotion of competitiveness is one of the fundamental aims and priority directions of the EU structural policy. The EU structural support is engaged as one of the public policy measures to promote the competitiveness of the member-states. In this context, it is purposeful to research whether the structural support is used efficiently and whether it actually contributes to the implementation of the defined aims. Under the order of various Lithuanian institutions, numerous studies on the efficiency of the EU structural support have been carried out. Nevertheless, by analysing the impact of the EU structural support, insufficient attention has been paid to the aspect of competitiveness. Considering the fact that Lithuania has entered the third programming period 2014-2020, evaluation of the EU structural investment in the country has become even more topical - for successful implementation of the aims raised for this new period, the analysis of the previous results is relevant. This determined formulation of the research problem: what impact does the EU structural support have on the competitiveness of Lithuanian economics? The empirical research has revealed that the EU structural support has a positive impact on Lithuanian gross domestic product growth, promotes foreign direct investment, research and development expenditure and increases the number of operating entities during 2004-2014 period.

Highlights

  • The European Union cohesion policy is aimed at contribution to economic growth and increase of competitiveness by promoting economic, social and territorial cohesion, sustainable development of the EU regions

  • The research is aimed at the establishment of the impact of the EU structural support, absorbed by Lithuania, on the main quantitative economic factors that determine the competitiveness of the country

  • For the empirical part of the research, correlation technique was selected in order to establish the existing links between the EU structural support and the indicators that reflect the competitiveness of Lithuania, such as gross domestic product (GDP), R&D expenditure rate, foreign direct investment (FDI), the number of operating entities, budget balance, annual inflation, employment rate, consumer price index (CPI) and foreign trade balance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The European Union (the EU) cohesion policy is aimed at contribution to economic growth and increase of competitiveness by promoting economic, social and territorial cohesion, sustainable development of the EU regions. The benefit of the EU structural support is described by its positive impact on economic development, which reveals itself with the increased investment in Research and Development (further R&D) and innovations, new products and production methods, infrastructure improvement, expansion of production capacities and specialization, improvement of human resources, reduction of unemployment rate and promotion of business development. Income distribution inequalities, determining internal competition distortions, private investment flush out, inflation pressure, and so on, are considered to be the negative outcomes of the structural support. The above-mentioned negative outcomes are basically determined by inefficient distribution and absorption of the support funds.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call