Abstract

We compare three different approaches to scale clearance (CL) from human hepatocyte and microsome CLint (intrinsic CL) for 52 drug compounds.By using the well-stirred model with protein binding included only 11% and 30% of the compounds were predicted within 2-fold and the average absolute fold errors (AAFE) for the predictions were 5.9 and 4.1 for hepatocytes and microsomes, respectively.When predictions were performed without protein binding, 59% of the compounds were predicted within 2-fold using either hepatocytes or microsomes and the AAFE was 2.2 and 2.3, respectively.For hepatocytes and microsomes there were significant correlations (P = 8.7 × 10−13, R2 = 0.72; P = 2.8 × 10−9, R2 = 0.61) between predicted CLint in vivo (obtained from in vitro CLint) and measured CLint in vivo (obtained using the well-stirred model). When CL was calculated from the regression, 76% and 70% of the compounds were predicted within 2-fold and the AAFE was 1.6 and 1.8 for hepatocytes and microsomes, respectively. We demonstrate that microsomes and hepatocytes are in many cases comparable when scaling of CL is performed from regression.By using the hepatocyte regression, CL for 82% of the compounds in an independent test set (n = 11) were predicted within 2-fold (AAFE 1.4). We suggest that a regression line that adjusts for systematic under-predictions should be the first-hand choice for scaling of CL.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.