Abstract

Simple SummaryAltered activity in a dog can be an early indicator of health and welfare concerns. Accelerometers, a type of activity monitor, are being used more frequently in dogs and may be a simple way for owners and veterinarians to monitor a dog’s changing health and welfare needs. However, there are few peer-reviewed studies evaluating the accuracy of these devices. Therefore, this study evaluated the accuracy of the FitBark 2 accelerometer (FitBark) by comparing activity data recorded using the FitBark to dog physical activity recorded using video analysis of dog step count. Dog step count and FitBark activity were highly correlated when the dogs were exploring a room off-leash and when they were interacting with their owner. However, when the dogs were being walked on a leash, low correlations between step count and FitBark activity were observed. In conclusion, the FitBark is a valid tool for tracking off-leash activity in dogs; however, more work should be done to identify the best method of tracking activity in on-leash situations.Accelerometers track changes in physical activity which can indicate health and welfare concerns in dogs. The FitBark 2 (FitBark) is an accelerometer for use with dogs; however, no studies have externally validated this tool. The objective of this study was to evaluate FitBark criterion validity by correlating FitBark activity data to dog step count. Dogs (n = 26) were fitted with a collar-mounted FitBark and individually recorded for 30 min using a three-phase approach: (1) off-leash room explore; (2) human–dog interaction; and (3) on-leash walk. Video analysis was used to count the number of times the front right paw touched the ground (step count). Dog step count and FitBark activity were moderately correlated across all phases (r = 0.65, p < 0.001). High correlations between step count and FitBark activity were observed during phases 1 (r = 0.795, p < 0.001) and 2 (r = 0.758, p < 0.001), and a low correlation was observed during phase 3 (r = 0.498, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the FitBark is a valid tool for tracking physical activity in off-leash dogs; however, more work should be done to identify the best method of tracking on-leash activity.

Highlights

  • Changes in physical activity level can be indicative of health and welfare concerns in dogs

  • In order to provide individualized animal treatment, it is important for dog owners, veterinarians, researchers, and other animal professionals to know the normal activity level for an individual dog, as deviations in either direction can serve as early indicators of health concerns

  • Wearable technology is becoming increasingly popular for dogs; it is critical that the information provided to users is accurate

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Changes in physical activity level can be indicative of health and welfare concerns in dogs. In order to provide individualized animal treatment, it is important for dog owners, veterinarians, researchers, and other animal professionals to know the normal activity level for an individual dog, as deviations in either direction can serve as early indicators of health concerns. A study evaluating an owner’s use of activity monitors for dogs determined that these devices are typically used to increase dog activity and improve the dog’s health and care [12]. These devices have the potential to impact human–dog interactions and dog welfare. It was hypothesized that FitBark activity monitors would be a valid tool for measuring physical activity in dogs

Animals
Testing
Statistical Analysis
Benefits and Drawbacks of the FitBark Activity Monitor
Conclusions
Findings
Objective
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call