Abstract

Press-through package (PTP) is the most common accidentally ingested foreign body in Japan. Accidental ingestion of PTP can result in esophageal damage. An approach for evaluating the risk of esophageal injury has not been established. Therefore, we used porcine esophageal tissue and silicone sheets to establish a method for assessing the risk of esophageal damage on accidental PTP ingestion. We pathologically evaluated porcine lower esophageal tissue using a scratch tester. Using porcine esophageal tissue, scratch tests were performed with 4 test objects and pathological damage was compared. It was assumed that each object was accidentally ingested. The objects were polyvinylidene chloride (PVDC)-coated polyvinyl chloride (PVC) PTP, soft PThPa, round PTP, and a disposable scalpel. The porcine esophagus was replaced with a silicon sheet, and an automatic friction machine was used for quantitative evaluation. The silicon sheet was scratched using HHS 2000 with 750-g load at 50 mm/min. We investigated the frictional force exerted on the surface for each of the objects. The degree of damage (depth) was the highest for the disposable scalpel, followed by PVDC-coated PVC PTP, while the degree of damage (depth) was the lowest for soft PThPa and round PTP. The mean frictional forces on the silicon sheet were 524.0 gf with PVDC-coated PTP, 323.5 gf with soft PThPa, 288.7 gf with round PTP, and 922.7 gf with the disposable scalpel. We developed approaches to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate the risk of esophageal damage after accidental PTP ingestion. Our findings indicate that the risk of gastrointestinal damage after accidental PTP ingestion is low with soft PTP and round PTP.

Highlights

  • Foreign body ingestion is a common emergency, and in infants younger than 3 years, it has been reported that the risk of accidental ingestion is high (Altkorn et al, 2008; Gregori et al, 2008)

  • There was no significant difference between soft PThPa and round Press-through package (PTP)

  • These pathological and quantitative evaluation were consistent that the higher damage risk was ingestion of disposable scalpel >polyvinylidene chloride (PVDC)-coated polyvinyl chloride (PVC) PTP >soft PThPa and round PTP in this order

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Foreign body ingestion is a common emergency, and in infants younger than 3 years, it has been reported that the risk of accidental ingestion is high (Altkorn et al, 2008; Gregori et al, 2008). Many previous reports have mentioned perforation rates as high as 35% after ingestion of sharp objects, and in severe cases, esophageal perforation has been shown to be accompanied with various complications (Birk et al, 2016; Sahn, Mamula & Ford, 2014; Kim et al, 2016; Sudo et al, 2003; Norstein et al, 1995; Kanazawa et al, 2015; Zou et al, 2011; Ambe et al, 2012; Laeeq et al, 2015; Law et al, 2017; Geraci et al, 2016; Burgos, Rabago & Triana, 2016). We used porcine esophageal tissue, which is similar to human esophageal tissue (Christie, Thomson & Hopwood, 1995), to establish a method for assessing the risk of esophageal damage on accidental PTP ingestion, and we pathologically evaluated porcine lower esophageal tissue using a scratch tester

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call