Abstract

Background: The pattern of various seat differs in many ways, however, the ergonomic design of chairs ensures proper weight distribution of the occupant. Therefore, for classroom furniture to perform the function for which it was designed, namely weight bearing and stabilisation of the body both in static and dynamic seating, it has to be ergonomically designed. Objective: To evaluate the ergonomic properties of furniture in two selected Faculties; the Faculty of Law (FL) and the Faculty of Health Science (FHS) of a Nigerian university. Materials and Methods: Forty furniture (20 furniture each from the two Faculties) in the University of Nigeria, Enugu State, South-east Nigeria were randomly selected. Ten parameters were measured. The mean, standard deviation, arithmetic difference, percentage match and mismatch were calculated using an established standard. Result: In five of the ten parameters considered, there are mismatch to (seat height, seat width, desk clearance, seat-to-desk distance and lumbar support) for FL and eight (seat height, seat depth, seat width, desk clearance, lumbar support, seat to desk, desk height, pan tilt) for FHS when compared to standard. Therefore, 50% match was seen in FL and 20% in FHS. T-Test shows significant difference between seat parameters in FL and FHS. Conclusion: More than 50% of the classroom furniture in FL was more ergonomically accurate compared to the 20% ergonomically accurate furniture in FHS. Furniture in the FL posed less ergonomic hazard than FHS. Replacement of these furniture are therefore recommended.

Highlights

  • IntroductionSeats vary reasonably in pattern and design, the function is remarkably similar

  • All over the world, seats vary reasonably in pattern and design, the function is remarkably similar

  • More than 50% of the classroom furniture in Faculty of Law (FL) was more ergonomically accurate compared to the 20% ergonomically accurate furniture in Faculty of Health Science (FHS)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Seats vary reasonably in pattern and design, the function is remarkably similar. All seats are designed to fixate and sustain the human body aligned in static and dynamic sitting positions [1]. Seats designed without ergonomic consideration places the body in a state of misalignment [2]. The state of misalignment of the body is a learned process or habit that starts at an early age as a child in the classroom and worsens with time. Some prolonged activities such as sitting, standing with its associated stress often results to misalignment of the body. The pattern of various seat differs in many ways, the ergonomic design of chairs ensures proper weight distribution of the occupant. For classroom furniture to perform the function for which it was designed, namely weight bearing and stabilisation of the body both in static and dynamic seating, it has to be ergonomically designed

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call