Abstract
Cosmetic ingredients were tested to determine the ability of the EpiOcular TM tissue model to predict eye irritation potential. In vitro results were compared with historical Draize eye irritation records. Forty-three samples, consisting of 40 cosmetic raw ingredients of different type and physical form (i.e. liquids, powders, gels) were evaluated. Using the MTT cytotoxicity assay, an ET 50 value (effective time of exposure to reduce tissue viability to 50%) was determined for each sample. ET 50 values were categorized into four irritation groups: (a) non-irritating/minimal; (b) mild; (c) moderate; or (d) severe/extreme. Comparison of in vitro EpiOcular TM and in vivo Draize classifications showed that 63% (27 of 43 samples) were classified identically. Assay performance improved to 95% (41 of 43 samples) with the addition of samples overpredicted by a single irritation class. This evaluative exercise represents a conservative safety assessment. There were no underpredictions of eye irritation for any material in this study. Based on these results, use of the EpiOcular TM tissue model shows promise as an in vitro assay to assess the ocular irritation potential of cosmetic ingredients.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
