Evaluation of the effectiveness of the sliding sheet in repositioning care in terms of working time and subjective fatigue: A comparative study with an experimental design

Abstract

BackgroundManual patient handling is a major cause of low back pain among healthcare staff. The sliding sheet is an assistive device designed to aid healthcare staff performing patient repositioning in bed. The use of sliding sheets in healthcare facilities is currently relatively rare because of the perceived additional time required compared with non-assisted handling. However, the details of the time difference between techniques and the barriers to the use of sliding sheets have not been examined in depth. ObjectivesWe sought to evaluate differences in working time and subjective fatigue between the use of sliding sheets and non-assisted handling techniques for patient repositioning, in order to understand the factors preventing the use of sliding sheets among nurses. DesignWe conducted a comparative study with an experimental design. SettingsThe study was conducted in the nursing practice room at a university in Japan. ParticipantsWe recruited 30 pairs of nurses and care receivers. All nurses were under 60 years old, with experience in lateral turning and repositioning in the process of changing diapers in clinical settings. Those with a previous or current medical history of low back pain were excluded. Care receivers were older adults (65–80 years old). We excluded adults with bedsores, body mass index values >30, or restricted joint motion due to femoral trochanteric fracture or compression fracture. Thus, 27 pairs were included in the final analysis. MethodsThe care receivers were instructed to behave as if they were bedridden patients with no limb movement, and as if they had contracture and difficulty communicating. Nurses repositioned the patient using three techniques assigned as interventions in random order: repositioning by one person using a sliding sheet (Sheet), repositioning by two people without a sliding sheet (Double), and repositioning by one person without a sliding sheet (Single). Working time was the primary endpoint for comparative analysis among the three technique conditions. ResultsThe results revealed that the Sheet technique required significantly more time than the non-assisted techniques. However, when total staff time was taken into consideration, the Sheet technique outperformed the Double technique. Moreover, the Sheet technique was associated with significantly lower levels of subjective fatigue, compared with the Double technique. ConclusionsThe use of a sliding sheet can substantially reduce caregiver burden when performing patient repositioning, and requires less staff time than manual techniques involving more than one caregiver.