Abstract
BackgroundAs a vulnerable population in China, migrant workers have a higher smoking rate than the general population. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a WHO-5A based comprehensive tobacco control program in workplaces aggregated with migrants.MethodsUsing a controlled before and after design, four purposely selected manufacturing factories were assigned to either intervention or control groups. Participants in the intervention arm received adapted 5A group counseling regularly supported by social-media and traditional health education approaches. The primary outcome was the change of smoking rate based on salivary cotinine concentration at three-month follow-up as compared to the control arm. Secondary outcomes were changes in smoking-related knowledge and attitudes assessed using questionnaires. Difference-in-differences approach (DID) and generalized estimating equations (GEE) models were used to conduct the effectiveness analysis.Results149 and 166 workers were enrolled in the intervention and control arm respectively. The multiple imputed and adjusted GEE models demonstrated that, compared to those in the control arm, participants in the intervention arm had nearly 2.4 times odds of improving smoking-related knowledge (OR = 2.40, 95% CI = 1.32–4.36, P = 0.02) and three times the odds of improving smoking-related attitude (OR = 3.07, 95% CI = 1.28–7.41, P = 0.03). However, no significant difference was found regarding the change of smoking rate between the two arms (P > 0.05). The regression analysis showed that attendance at the 5A group counseling sections was an important determinant of stopping smoking or improving smoking-related knowledge and attitudes in the intervention group.ConclusionsThis WHO-5A comprehensive intervention was effective in improving migrant workers’ knowledge of smoking and anti-smoking attitudes. A large-scale, long-term trial is recommended to determine the effectiveness of this intervention.Trial registrationChiCTR-OPC-17011637 at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. Retrospectively registered on 12th June 2017.
Highlights
As a vulnerable population in China, migrant workers have a higher smoking rate than the general population
As compared to the control arm, the intervention arm had a higher proportion of participants who were male (91.28% vs. 82.53%, P < 0.05), aged over 36 years old (69.80% vs. 51.21%, P < 0.001), had a monthly income of 2000–4000 Yuan RMB (84.57% vs. 65.66%, P < 0.001)
The smoking rate based on the salivary cotinine was higher in the intervention arm than the control arm (55.70% vs. 34.94%, P < 0.001)
Summary
As a vulnerable population in China, migrant workers have a higher smoking rate than the general population. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a WHO-5A based comprehensive tobacco control program in workplaces aggregated with migrants. Several laws and regulations are available at the local level, the progress and effect on tobacco control varied across geographical areas. It was not until the end of 2014 that the Cigarette Control Regulations in the Public Areas, including workplaces, was drafted and reported to the State Council of China, but it has not yet been issued nationwide [4]. Data from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) project shows that China has the highest rate (70%) of smoking in the workplaces in the world [5]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
