Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of a multi-faceted computerized antimicrobial stewardship intervention in surgical settings: A single-centre cluster-randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Inappropriate antimicrobial use is common among patients undergoing surgery. It remains unclear whether a multi-faceted computerized antimicrobial stewardship programme is effective and safe in reducing inappropriate antimicrobial use in surgical settings. A multi-faceted computerized antimicrobial stewardship intervention system was developed, and an open-label, cluster-randomized, controlled trial was conducted among 18 surgical teams that enrolled 2470 patients for open chest cardiovascular surgery. The surgical teams were divided at random into intervention and control groups at a ratio of 1:1. The primary endpoints were days of therapy (DOT)/1000 patient-days, defined daily dose (DDD)/1000 patient-days and length of therapy (LOT)/1000 patient-days. Mean DOT, DDD and LOT per 1000 patient-days were significantly lower in the intervention group compared with the control group (472.2 vs 539.8, 459.5 vs 553.8, and 438.4 vs 488.7; P<0.05), with reductions of 14.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.8-16.7%], 18.7% (95% CI 15.9-21.4%) and 11.9% (95% CI 9.6-14.1%), respectively. The daily risk of inappropriate antimicrobial use after discharge from the intensive care unit decreased by 23.9% [95% CI 15.5-31.5% (incidence risk ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.69-0.85)] in the intervention group. There was no significant difference in rates of infection or surgical-related complications between the groups. Median antimicrobial costs were significantly lower in the intervention group {873.4 [interquartile range (IQR) 684.5-1255.4] RMB vs 1178.7 (IQR 869.1-1814.5) RMB; P<0.001} (1 RMB approximately equivalent to 0.16 US$ in 2022). The multi-faceted computerized antimicrobial stewardship interventions reduced inappropriate antimicrobial use safely. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04328090.