Evaluation of the effect of ultrasound guidance on the accuracy of intercostal nerve injection: a canine cadaveric study

Abstract

ObjectiveTo develop an ultrasound-guided approach to intercostal nerve injection and to compare the success rate of intercostal nerve injections using blind or ultrasound-guided technique in canine cadavers. Study designProspective, randomized, descriptive, experimental anatomic study. AnimalsA total of 14 mid-sized adult canine cadavers. MethodsUltrasound landmarks were identified by dissection of four cadavers and used to develop an ultrasound-guided technique. The remaining 10 cadavers were randomly assigned to blind (five cadavers) or ultrasound-guided (five cadavers) injections of the third to the ninth intercostal nerves bilaterally with 0.03 mL kg–1 of colorant per injection. The target for intercostal injections was the caudal border of the respective rib, between the internal intercostal membrane and the parietal pleura. Additionally, displacement of the parietal pleura without visible intramuscular distribution was considered the end point for ultrasound-guided injections. For each cadaver, a practitioner in training performed the blocks on one hemithorax, while an experienced practitioner performed the blocks on the opposite hemithorax. Injections were considered successful if ≥1 cm of the target nerve was stained with colorant upon dissection. Success rates and length of nerve staining were analyzed with Fisher’s exact and t tests, respectively. Data were considered statistically different with p < 0.05. ResultsSuccess rates of blind and ultrasound-guided technique were 57.1% and 91.4%, respectively (p < 0.0001). The length of intercostal nerve staining was 3.1 ± 1.2 cm and 3.6 ± 1.0 cm using blind and ultrasound-guided techniques, respectively (p = 0.02). No differences were observed between the two practitioners for blind (p = 0.33) and ultrasound-guided techniques (p = 0.67). Conclusions and clinical relevanceUltrasound guidance improves the accuracy of intercostal nerve injections when compared with blind technique, independently of the level of expertise in regional anesthesia.