Abstract
In the vinegar fly Drosophila melanogaster, the majority of olfactory receptors mediating the detection of volatile chemicals found in their natural habitat have been functionally characterized (deorphanized) in vivo. In this process, receptors have been assigned ligands leading to either excitation or inhibition in the olfactory sensory neuron where they are expressed. In other, non-drosophilid insect species, scientists have not yet been able to compile datasets about ligand–receptor interactions anywhere near as extensive as in the model organism D. melanogaster, as genetic tools necessary for receptor deorphanization are still missing. Recently, it was discovered that exposure to artificially high concentrations of odorants leads to reliable alterations in mRNA levels of interacting odorant receptors in mammals. Analyzing receptor expression after odorant exposure can, therefore, help to identify ligand–receptor interactions in vivo without the need for other genetic tools. Transfer of the same methodology from mice to a small number of receptors in D. melanogaster resulted in a similar trend, indicating that odorant exposure induced alterations in mRNA levels are generally applicable for deorphanization of interacting chemosensory receptors. Here, we evaluated the potential of the DREAM (Deorphanization of receptors based on expression alterations in mRNA levels) technique for high-throughput deorphanization of chemosensory receptors in insect species using D. melanogaster as a model. We confirmed that in some cases the exposure of a chemosensory receptor to high concentration of its best ligand leads to measureable alterations in mRNA levels. However, unlike in mammals, we found several cases where either confirmed ligands did not induce alterations in mRNA levels of the corresponding chemosensory receptors, or where gene transcript-levels were altered even though there is no evidence for a ligand–receptor interaction. Hence, there are severe limitations to the suitability of the DREAM technique for deorphanization as a general tool to characterize olfactory receptors in insects.
Highlights
Despite more than two decades of research, the mechanisms by which mammals as well as insects detect a seemingly unlimited amount of odorants with a comparably small set of chemosensory receptors remain elusive up to date
When we exposed 0 to 3 h-old flies to the described best ligand for Or67c and Or82a, that is, ethyl lactate and geranyl acetate, respectively, we observed a significant reduction in the mRNA levels of these genes at the end of the treatment
Exposure to geranyl acetate did downregulate the transcription of Or82a as expected, and interestingly of Or47a (Figure 1C), which is expressed in an olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) that is co-localized in the same sensillum as the OSN expressing Or82a
Summary
Despite more than two decades of research, the mechanisms by which mammals as well as insects detect a seemingly unlimited amount of odorants with a comparably small set of chemosensory receptors remain elusive up to date. D. melanogaster expresses a set of approximately 62 known chemosensory receptor types total on the antennae and maxillary palps conferring the detection of a multitude of different odorants in nature including odorants for the location of food sources (Zhu et al, 2003; Hallem and Carlson, 2006; Dweck et al, 2016) as well as oviposition sites (Dweck et al, 2013), avoidance of harmful microorganisms (Stensmyr et al, 2012) or natural enemies (Ebrahim et al, 2015), and for governing courtship behavior (Clyne et al, 1997; Dweck et al, 2015b). These chemosensory receptors can be categorized into two types of receptors, those which only interact with a small set of ligands or even just one odorant, referred to as narrowly tuned receptors, and those which have a broad spectrum of ligands, characterized as broadly tuned receptors
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have