Abstract
The problems of improving the quality of technological processes in domestic enterprises due to their high relevance are reflected in numerous publications of both theoretical and practical nature. However, the performance assessment procedures in the standards are schematically not properly spelled out. This makes it difficult in practice to choose evaluation mechanisms and methods. The priority mechanism of improvement of the enterprise's activity in the field of quality is measurement of efficiency and efficiency of the current quality management system. In our opinion, any activity aimed at improving quality should be economically justified at the stage of its planning. The article proposes a mechanism for assessing the cost-effectiveness of using one of the tools of quality management – analysis of the types, consequences and causes of potential consequences of the industrial production process. The purpose of this analysis is to ensure that all process quality requirements with increased risk are met by developing corrective measures to eliminate the occurrence of probable failures. The article provides an example of such a process-specific analysis. The presented mechanism for assessing the economic efficiency of QMS is based on the real financial performance of the enterprise and can be used at domestic industrial enterprises to measure the costs and results of investments in product (work, services) quality management.
Highlights
The problems of improving the quality of technological processes in domestic enterprises due to their high relevance are reflected in numerous publications of both theoretical and practical nature
Any activity aimed at improving quality should be economically justified at the stage of its planning
The article proposes a mechanism for assessing the cost-effectiveness of using one of the tools of quality management – analysis of the types, consequences and causes of potential consequences of the industrial production process
Summary
Вычисление приоритетного числа риска для данного дефекта / причины (ПЧР); 9. Перечень дефектов / причин, для которых значение ПЧР превышает ПЧРГР. Для каждого дефекта / причины с ПЧР ≥ ПЧРГРFMEA-команда должна предпринимать усилия к снижению этого расчетного показателя посредством доработки конструкции и (или) производственного процесса. Как действия по доработке определены, необходимо оценить и записать значения баллов значимости S, возникновения О и обнаружения D для нового предложенного варианта конструкции и (или) производственного процесса. Экономические аспекты применения метода FMEA рассмотрим на примере сборки каркасных узлов хвостового оперения самолетов на ПАО «ВАСО». В таблице 2 представим результаты оценки параметра риска потребителя по наиболее значимым дефектам сборки каркасных узлов хвостового оперения самолетов на ПАО «ВАСО». Не вовремя вписан документ в техпаспорт Technologist error, document is not entered into technical passport in time
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
