Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the presentations, clinical course, treatments, and outcomes of endogenous endophthalmitis cases. Methods: Consecutive medical records from 2016 to 2021 of a county hospital and an academic, private hospital in Dallas, Texas were retrospectively reviewed. This study comprised 37 eyes of 31 patients with endogenous endophthalmitis. Collected data included demographic factors, identifiable risk factors, medical history, presenting symptoms, infectious data, complications, and best-corrected visual acuity (VA) throughout the clinical course. Results: Twenty-two eyes had bacterial endophthalmitis, 7 had fungal endophthalmitis, and 8 had infections that could not be classified. Of the bacterial cases, 5 eyes had panophthalmitis with associated cellulitis. The most common organisms were Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The most common presenting symptoms were decreased vision (70%), eye redness (41%), and eye pain (38%). Among all cases, there was no significant difference in the presenting logMAR VA (1.86) before treatment and the most recent logMAR VA (1.75; P = .70) after treatment. However, fungal infections demonstrated better logMAR VA than bacterial infections 6 months after diagnosis (mean logMAR VA, 0.93 vs 2.54, respectively; P = .016) and at most recent follow-up (mean logMAR VA, 0.76 vs 2.3, respectively; P = .004). There was also a strong correlation between presenting VA and most recent VA (r2 = 0.81; P < .01). Conclusions: Visual outcomes of endogenous endophthalmitis cases were poor. Our study found 2 components to be predictive of final VA: (1) whether the infecting organism was bacterial or fungal and (2) a patient's presenting VA.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.