Evaluation of the capacity and effective angle of thalamic damage for two commercially available captive bolt tool types on cadaver heads from sows > 200kg body weight.

Abstract

This study evaluated the ability of two penetrating captive bolt (PCB) types (PISTOL, INLINE) to reach and disrupt the thalamus when applied in two placements (FRONTAL, BEHIND EAR) to chilled cadaver heads (N=60) from sows > 200kg. Heads were randomly distributed across six treatments (n=10): FRONTAL-INLINE, FRONTAL-PISTOL, FRONTAL-NO SHOT, BEHIND EAR-INLINE, BEHIND EAR-PISTOL, and BEHIND EAR-NO SHOT. The FRONTAL shot was placed 3.5cm superior to the optic orbits at the midline; the BEHIND EAR shot was placed directly caudal to the pinna of the ear on the same plane as the eyes and targeting the middle of the opposite eye. For INLINE treatments, a Jarvis PAS-Type C 0.25R Super Heavy Duty PCB with a Long Bolt and 6.0 GR power loads was used. For PISTOL treatments, a Jarvis PAS-Type P 0.25R Pistol PCB with a Long Stunning Rod Nosepiece Assembly and 3.5 GR power loads was used. Heads were split along the bolt with a band saw. Tissue depth measurements are reported as Mean ± SE followed by 97.5% one-sided upper reference limit (URL). Total tissue thickness was less (P < 0.0001) at the FRONTAL (56.31±1.76mm; URL: 73.17mm) than the BEHIND EAR placement (95.52±3.30mm; URL: 126.53mm). Thalamic depth was less (P < 0.0001) at the FRONTAL (78.31±1.32mm; URL: 88.19mm) than the BEHIND EAR placement (111.86±3.22mm; URL: 135.99mm). Effective angle was greater (P < 0.0001) at the FRONTAL (4.72±0.20°) than the BEHIND EAR placement (3.22±0.17°). Potential for bolt-brain contact was not different (P = 1.0000) between FRONTAL-INLINE (10/10, 100±0.01%), FRONTAL-PISTOL (10/10, 100±0.01%), BEHIND EAR-INLINE (9/10, 90±9.49%), and BEHIND EAR-PISTOL (10/10, 100±0.01%); brain damage (P = 0.5577) between FRONTAL-INLINE (9/9, 100±0.02%), FRONTAL-PISTOL (10/10, 100±0.02%), BEHIND EAR-INLINE (4/10, 40±15.49%), and BEHIND EAR-PISTOL (1/10, 10±9.49%); potential for bolt-thalamus contact (P = 0.0683) for FRONTAL-INLINE (2/10, 20±12.65%), FRONTAL-PISTOL (8/10, 80±12.65%), BEHIND EAR-INLINE (7/9, 77.78±13.86%), and BEHIND EAR-PISTOL (9/9, 100±0.02%); or thalamic damage (P = 0.8041) for FRONTAL-INLINE (1/10, 10±9.49%), FRONTAL-PISTOL (1/10, 10±9.49%), BEHIND EAR-INLINE (2/8, 25±15.31%), and BEHIND EAR-PISTOL (0/9, 0±0.00%). The FRONTAL placement with an INLINE PCB may present the least risk of failure for the PCB euthanasia of mature sows > 200kg BW due to less total tissue thickness and thalamic depth, greater effective angle, and prevalent brain damage.