Abstract

Introduction: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a powerful diagnostic technique used to acquire detailed information on the structure and function of the body’s organs. Data on the extent of genetic damage following exposure to electromagnetic fields in MRI is variable, necessitating further evidence. This study aims to examine the biological effect of exposure to MRI at various magnetic strengths on the DNA single-strand. Methods: The study was an in-vivo non-randomized controlled experiment involving New Zealand rabbits (n=39, males) scanned using three different MRI strengths (0.5, 1.5 and 3.0 T) and at different time intervals (10, 20, 30, and 40 minutes). The alkaline comet assay was used to study DNA damage by quantifying single-strand breaks. In addition, tail length (TL), tail moment (TM), and the fraction of total DNA in the tail were evaluated. Results: The DNA single-strand breaks were significant for all tested parameters in both MRI 1.5 T (p<0.01) and 3.0 T (p<0.001). In addition, 3.0 T for 40 minutes had the most comet tails and tail moment (13.87), resulting in greater %DNA damage (mean=22.37). Exposure to 0.5 T was found to be only significant at 30 and 40 minutes (p<0.001). Conclusion: Higher MRI strength for a longer duration resulted in a significant increase in DNA single-strand breaks. Understanding the interaction between the magnetic fields generated by MRI and DNA will optimize safe and effective MRI scanning in both patients and healthy individuals.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.