Abstract

a b s t r a c t Objectives: We have evaluated the recently Conformite Europeenne (CE)-marked Bio-Rad Geenius human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)1/2 as a rapid and simple alternative to western blot for confirmation of HIV screening results. Methods: A total of 160 serum samples were tested: 44 HIV-1 reactive samples by a fourth-generation Murex HIV Ag/Ab and/or Vidas HIV Duo Ultra, five HIV-2 reactive samples, 15 HIV-1 non-B subtype samples and 11 confirmed HIV-1 early seroconversion samples, 72 nonreactive samples, eight indeter- minate samples by MP HIV BLOT 2.2 confirmed negative after follow-up and five low-reactive samples by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) negative by MP HIV BLOT 2.2. The samples were tested according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Results: The overall sensitivity for Bio-Rad Geenius HIV1/2 assay was 92%. Five out of 11 early serocon- version samples were tested positive, four negative and two indeterminate. All HIV-1 non-B subtype samples were tested positive. Two out of the five HIV-2 reactive samples were tested positive HIV-2, two positive HIV-2 with HIV-1 cross-reaction and one HIV positive untypable. After excluding early sero- conversion samples, the sensitivity of Bio-Rad Geenius HIV1/2 assay reached 100%. Overall specificity was 96%. All HIV negative serums by fourth-generation EIA were tested negative. All five low-reactive samples by EIA, negative by HIV BLOT 2.2 were tested negative by Bio-Rad Geenius HIV1/2. Two out of the eight indeterminate samples by MP HIV BLOT 2.2 that were confirmed negative after follow-up were tested indeterminate and one invalid, the other five were negative. After excluding these last 13 samples, the specificity of Bio-Rad Geenius HIV1/2 assay reached 100%. In comparison with MP HIV BLOT 2.2, the Bio-Rad Geenius HIV1/2 assay was markedly time saving, allowed full traceability, automatic reading and interpretation. Conclusions: The Bio-Rad Geenius HIV1/2 confirmatory system represents a reliable alternative to other confirmatory assays in HIV testing algorithms and provides clear improvement in quality management. © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Highlights

  • HIV testing algorithms include a supplemental assay to confirm and differentiate HIV-1 and HIV-2 on repeated reactive samples by a 4th generation EIA screening test (EIA)

  • In this study we evaluate the recently CE-marked Bio-Rad Geenius HIV1/2 (Geenius) confirmatory assay, a single use immunochromatographic test, in comparison with the MP Diagnostic HIV Blot 2.2 (WB)

  • A total of 161 serum samples were tested by Geenius test: 72 nonreactive samples by EIA (Liaison XL Murex and/or VIDAS bioMérieux), 8 indeterminate samples by WB confirmed negative after follow up, 5 low reactive samples by EIA negative by WB and confirmed negative after follow up, 44 HIV-1 reactive samples by EIA and WB, 5 HIV-2 reactive samples, 1 HIV-1/HIV-2 co-infection sample, 15 HIV-1 non-B subtype samples (8 CRF02, 1 CRF01, 1 CRF11, 1 CRF15, 2 subtype G, 1 subtype F1, 1 subtype C) and 11 confirmed HIV-1 early seroconversion samples

Read more

Summary

Introduction

HIV testing algorithms include a supplemental assay to confirm and differentiate HIV-1 and HIV-2 on repeated reactive samples by a 4th generation EIA screening test (EIA). In this study we evaluate the recently CE-marked Bio-Rad Geenius HIV1/2 (Geenius) confirmatory assay, a single use immunochromatographic test, in comparison with the MP Diagnostic HIV Blot 2.2 (WB)

Methods
Results
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call