Abstract
The aim of this retrospective study was to differentiate complications from malpractices in surgical cases and to help specialists who work as court experts in malpractice litigations. We reviewed 366 malpractice cases notified to The Higher Health Council by Criminal Courts between 1995 and 2000. Of these, 93 had General surgical malpractice cases. The data showed that a large proportion of malpractice litigations against surgeons resulted from deviations of the surgeons from their own field of study. The surgeons did not obtain informed consent from patients in the majority of the cases. The rate of autopsy in deaths from malpractices was 79.6%. Fifty percent of malpractice litigations were groundless. It can be suggested that incessant exposure to criticisms and complaints may make innocent surgeons less willing to take risks for patients.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
