Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to assess and correlate the stress distribution in an anterior maxillary implant-supported prosthesis with 0°(degree), 15°, and 25° angulated titanium and zirconia abutments using a three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis (FEA). Materials and Methods Six FEA models consisting of a dentate anterior maxilla with a single bone-level implant of dimension 4.2 × 10 mm placed in the region of left maxillary central incisor and abutments of dimension 4.2 mm made of titanium and zirconia each with angulation 0° (IA and IB), 15° (IIA and IIB), and 25° (IIIA and IIIB) and ANSYS Workbench software were utilized to design a layered zirconia crown. Unilateral axial and oblique loads of 178 N were applied on the palatal aspect of the crown of left maxillary central incisor. Average von Mises stress values were evaluated in the implant and the peri-implant bone quantitatively and qualitatively. Results Stress was shown to increase with an increase in angulation in all the areas that were examined. Zirconia abutments showed lesser stress in the implant and surrounding bone than titanium abutments. When compared with the body and apex of the implant, the implant neck values were higher in all models. In between cortical and cancellous bone, the stress recorded was higher in the cortical bone. Conclusion Within the limitations of this study, straight abutments generated a more uniform and minimal stress in implant and peri-implant bone than angulated abutments. Titanium abutments generated higher stress levels than zirconia abutments. The stresses generated are directly proportional to an increase in abutment angulation, and therefore, straight abutments are most suitable for favourable stress transmission.

Highlights

  • Limitations in the form of anatomic differences like concavities seen on the buccal aspects of the bone and compromised bone width in the maxillary anterior bone create difficulties in prosthetically placing an implant in the most aesthetic three-dimensional spatial position. e use of angulated abutment has made the management of surgically driven clinical situations simple especially where implant placements are far from ideal [1,2,3]

  • When stress distribution was evaluated and compared among the three groups, an increase in stress concentration was found with an increase in angulation of the abutment, least being in Model IA and maximum in Model IIIA (25° abutment angulation regardless of the direction of load application)

  • Under oblique loading conditions, the stresses increased by 10% on palatal aspect and 21% on labial aspect in Model IIIA compared with Model IA. is infers that the von Mises stress increased to a greater extent in labial aspect compared with palatal aspect with an increase in abutment angulation under oblique loading

Read more

Summary

Research Article

Evaluation of Stress Generated with Different Abutment Materials and Angulations under Axial and Oblique Loading in the Anterior Maxilla: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. E aim of this study was to assess and correlate the stress distribution in an anterior maxillary implant-supported prosthesis with 0°(degree), 15°, and 25° angulated titanium and zirconia abutments using a three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis (FEA). Six FEA models consisting of a dentate anterior maxilla with a single bone-level implant of dimension 4.2 × 10 mm placed in the region of left maxillary central incisor and abutments of dimension 4.2 mm made of titanium and zirconia each with angulation 0° (IA and IB), 15° (IIA and IIB), and 25° (IIIA and IIIB) and ANSYS Workbench software were utilized to design a layered zirconia crown. Within the limitations of this study, straight abutments generated a more uniform and minimal stress in implant and peri-implant bone than angulated abutments. Titanium abutments generated higher stress levels than zirconia abutments. e stresses generated are directly proportional to an increase in abutment angulation, and straight abutments are most suitable for favourable stress transmission

Introduction
International Journal of Dentistry
Group B zirconia abutment
Results
IIIB IIIA IIIB
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call