Abstract

Cardiac care regionalization, specifically for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), has been touted as a potential mechanism to reduce systematic disparities by protocolizing the treatment of these conditions. However, it is unknown whether such regionalization arrangements have widened or narrowed disparities in access, treatment, and outcomes for minority communities. To determine the extent to which disparities in access, treatment, and outcomes have changed for patients with STEMI living in zip codes that are in the top tertile of the Black or Hispanic population compared with patients in nonminority zip codes in regionalized vs nonregionalized counties. This cohort study used a quasi-experimental approach exploiting the different timing of regionalization across California. Nonpublic inpatient data for all patients with STEMI from January 1, 2006, to October 31, 2015, were analyzed using a difference-in-difference-in-differences estimation approach. Exposure to the intervention was defined as on and after the year a patient's county was exposed to regionalization. Access to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-capable hospital, receipt of PCI on the same day and at any time during the hospitalization, and time-specific all-cause mortality. This study included 139 494 patients with STEMI; 61.9% of patients were non-Hispanic White, 5.6% Black, 17.8% Hispanic, and 9.0% Asian; 32.8% were women. Access to PCI-capable hospitals improved by 6.3 percentage points (95% CI, 5.5 to 7.1 percentage points; P < .001) when patients in nonminority communities were exposed to regionalization. Patients in minority communities experienced a 1.8-percentage point smaller improvement in access (95% CI, -2.8 to -0.8 percentage points; P < .001), or 28.9% smaller, compared with those in nonminority communities when both were exposed to regionalization. Regionalization was associated with an improvement to same-day PCI and in-hospital PCI by 5.1 percentage points (95% CI, 4.2 to 6.1 percentage points; P < .001) and 5.0 percentage points (95% CI, 4.2 to 5.9 percentage points; P < .001), respectively, for patients in nonminority communities. Patients in minority communities experienced only 33.3% and 15.1% of that benefit. Only White patients in nonminority communities experienced mortality improvement from regionalization. Although regionalization was associated with improved access to PCI hospitals and receipt of PCI treatment, patients in minority communities derived significantly smaller improvement relative to those in nonminority communities.

Highlights

  • Access to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-capable hospitals improved by 6.3 percentage points when patients in nonminority communities were exposed to regionalization

  • Regionalization was associated with an improvement to same-day PCI and in-hospital PCI by 5.1 percentage points and 5.0 percentage points, respectively, for patients in nonminority communities

  • AND RELEVANCE regionalization was associated with improved access to PCI hospitals and receipt of PCI treatment, patients in minority communities derived significantly smaller improvement relative to those in nonminority communities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Disparities in the treatment and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction for minorities have been widely documented.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8] Studies have consistently shown that Black[7,9,10] and Hispanic[11] patients have lower rates of revascularization of any type after an acute myocardial infarction, and have significantly longer door-to-needle and door-to-balloon times,[7,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] with some improvements in door-to-balloon times in more recent years.[18] For ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) Black patients are more likely than White patients to experience an in-hospital stroke or major bleeding after a STEMI and have higher long-term mortality.[12,19]. Regionalization of STEMI care is associated with increased use of reperfusion therapy and faster time to treatment.[22,23] The goal of STEMI regionalization has been to achieve the recommended interventions—percutaneous coronary intervention within 90 minutes from first medical contact for direct transport to a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)–capable facility and within 120 minutes from first medical contact for transfers24,25—by designating hospital capabilities and emergency medical services (EMS) bypass of facilities with lesser designation when appropriate.[26,27,28]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call