Abstract

Task mapping is an important issue in MPSoC design. Most recent mapping algorithms perform them at design time, an approach known as static mapping. Nonetheless, applications running in MPSoCs may execute a varying number of simultaneous tasks. In some cases, applications may be defined only after system design, enforcing a scenario that requires the use of dynamic task mapping. Static mappings have as main advantage the global view of the system, while dynamic mappings normally provide a local view, which considers only the neighborhood of the mapping task. This work aims to evaluate the pros and cons of static and dynamic mapping solutions. Due to the global system view, it is expected that static mapping algorithms achieve superior performance (w.r.t. latency, congestion, energy consumption). As dynamic scenarios are a trend in present MPSoC designs, the cost of dynamic mapping algorithms must be known, and directions to improve the quality of such algorithms should be provided without increasing execution time. This quantitative comparison between static and dynamic mapping algorithms is the main contribution of this work.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call