Evaluation of soybean grain quality and yield across various row spacings, planting dates, and fungicide programs

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

AbstractOne of the major constraints to profitable soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] production is yield losses caused by disease. The mid‐southern region of the United States typically experiences environmental conditions that are conducive to disease development, particularly during later reproductive growth stages. It is common for producers in this region to apply fungicides at the beginning of pod development (R3 growth stage; development of pods 3/16 inches long). Producers often question if establishing crops in different row patterns would alter the yield response to prophylactic fungicide applications. Producers also seek answers regarding the yield and grain quality responses to fungicide applications across different row patterns. However, limited data exist to determine if fungicide applications influence the responses of soybean's yield and grain quality between different row spacings. The objective of this research was to evaluate soybean's growth, development, yield, and grain quality across various row spacings, planting dates, and prophylactic fungicide application programs in the absence of disease. These data support that early‐planted soybean had greater yield than later‐planted soybean. No interactions were observed among row spacing, planting date, and fungicide product with respect to yield. Independently, no yield differences were observed regardless of the row spacing or the fungicide product. Regarding quality, soybean planted later resulted in fewer total damaged soybean kernels. These data suggest that row spacing and planting date may not influence soybean's yield response to prophylactic fungicide. Furthermore, these data also suggest that prophylactic fungicide during pod development may not influence the subsequent grain quality.