Abstract

The evaluation of infiltration characteristics and some parameters of infiltration models such as sorptivity and final steady infiltration rate in soils are important in agriculture. The aim of this study was to evaluate some of the most common models used to estimate final soil infiltration rate. The equality of final infiltration rate with saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) was also tested. Moreover, values of the estimated sorptivity from the Philip's model were compared to estimates by selected pedotransfer functions (PTFs). The infiltration experiments used the doublering method on soils with two different land uses in the Taleghan watershed of Tehran province, Iran, from September to October, 2007. The infiltration models of Kostiakov-Lewis, Philip two-term and Horton were fitted to observed infiltration data. Some parameters of the models and the coefficient of determination goodness of fit were estimated using MATLAB software. The results showed that, based on comparing measured and model-estimated infiltration rate using root mean squared error (RMSE), Horton's model gave the best prediction of final infiltration rate in the experimental area. Laboratory measured Ks values gave significant differences and higher values than estimated final infiltration rates from the selected models. The estimated final infiltration rate was not equal to laboratory measured Ks values in the study area. Moreover, the estimated sorptivity factor by Philip's model was significantly different to those estimated by selected PTFs. It is suggested that the applicability of PTFs is limited to specific, similar conditions.

Highlights

  • Infiltration is the term applied to the process of water entry into soil (Hillel, 1980)

  • Evaluation of soil infiltration characteristics and determination of the final steady infiltration rate are required for increased irrigation water use efficiency, the design of irrigation systems, and decreased water and soil losses which are important factors in agriculture

  • The results showed that the Kostiakov-Lewis model could not estimate the final steady infiltration rate at point 4 and the estimated values of this parameter using this model underestimated the observed ones at all points and had the greatest errors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Infiltration is the term applied to the process of water entry into soil (Hillel, 1980). Since measuring the final infiltration rate is time consuming, several models have been proposed to determine this parameter. Empirical models such as those of Kostiakov (1932) and Horton (1940), and physical models such as that of Philip (1957) are the most commonly models to estimate final infiltration rate. Singh (1992) stated that the various models can estimate different values of the final soil infiltration rate which seems incorrect as the parameter is soil-dependent. Hajabbasi (2006) evaluated the Kostiakov, Horton, and Philip’s infiltration models under different tillage and rotations in a clay-loam in North-west Iran and reported that the Horton’s model gave the best prediction of infiltration rate in that region

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call