Abstract

Land surface models are used to provide global estimates of soil organic carbon (SOC) changes after past and future change land use change (LUC), in particular re-/deforestation. To evaluate how well the models capture decadal-scale changes in SOC after LUC, we provide the first consistent comparison of simulated time series of LUC by six land models all of which participated in the coupled model intercomparison project phase 6 (CMIP6) with soil carbon chronosequences (SCCs). For this comparison we use SOC measurements of adjacent plots at four high-quality data sites in temperate and tropical regions. We find that initial SOC stocks differ among models due to different approaches to represent SOC. Models generally meet the direction of SOC change after reforestation of cropland but the amplitude and rate of changes vary strongly among them. The normalized root mean square errors of the multi model mean range from 0.5 to 0.8 across sites and 0.1–0.7 when excluding outliers. Further, models simulate SOC losses after deforestation for crop or grassland too slow due to the lack of crop harvest impacts in the models or an overestimation of the SOC recovery on grassland. The representation of management, especially nitrogen levels is important to capture drops in SOC after land abandonment for forest regrowth. Crop harvest and fire management are important to match SOC dynamics but more difficult to quantify as SCC rarely report on these events. Based on our findings, we identify strengths and propose potential improvements of the applied models in simulating SOC changes after LUC.

Highlights

  • Soils store the largest amount of carbon in the global land carbon cycle (Jackson et al 2017) and are of interest for climate mitigation measures (Fargione et al 2018, Bossio et al 2020)

  • After one to two decades, soil organic carbon (SOC) increases in the soil carbon chronosequences (SCCs) as the regrowing forest accumulates carbon in the forest floor building up a humus layer

  • SOC increases by 50% after 30 years after the initial drop is passed (T50, table 3)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Soils store the largest amount of carbon in the global land carbon cycle (Jackson et al 2017) and are of interest for climate mitigation measures (Fargione et al 2018, Bossio et al 2020). More than two thirds of the global soils have experienced land cover change (alteration of surface vegetation) or land use change (alteration of land management; LUC) with the resulting soil organic carbon (SOC) changes contributing approximately one third of the historical LUC related emissions (Houghton et al 2012, Quéré et al 2015, Sanderman et al 2017). Such estimates come with great uncertainties (Gasser et al 2020). Litter fluxes depend on plant productivity and plant type, while decomposition rates

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.