Abstract

This paper presents the evaluation of three inclined irradiance and illuminance anisotropic models (Klucher, Hay and Perez) for Hong Kong using two-year (1996–1997) measured data. A statistical analysis of the three models has shown that predictions for solar irradiance tend to be more accurate than daylight illuminance. All three models produce large errors for north-facing surfaces. Predictions for south-facing surfaces show reasonably good agreement with measured data, indicating good estimations of anisotropic diffuse component at sunlit surfaces. In general, Perez’s model shows the best predictions for vertical solar irradiance and daylight illuminance followed by, Hay’s, then Klucher’s models.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.