Abstract
BackgroundCenter-of-pressure (CoP) measurements have been studied for assessing balance control. While CoP measurements using force plates have been used to assess standing balance in children with cerebral palsy (CP), it has not been assessed in a sitting position, which specifically reflects trunk postural control. Research questionThe purpose of this study was to compare CoP measurements using force plates during both standing and sitting trials with the Pediatric Balance Scale (PBS) in children with spastic CP. MethodsWe recruited 26 children with spastic CP (7.8 ± 3.4 years, 4–13 years) and used the PBS, a validated evaluation tool that measures static and dynamic balance control. We took CoP measurements using force plates during sitting and standing. For both trials, subjects stayed still for 10 s with their eyes open or closed. We calculated the CoP velocity, mediolateral (ML) and anteroposterior (AP) velocity, and ML and AP displacements of CoP. Results and SignificanceDuring standing trials, static PBS standing scores negatively correlated with more AP displacement and velocity than ML displacement and velocity (p < 0.05). During sitting trials, dynamic PBS sitting scores negatively correlated with ML displacement and velocity (p < 0.05). CoP parameters in the ML direction of the sitting position and CoP parameters in the AP direction of the standing position may better reflect the balance control in children with spastic CP.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.