Abstract

Purpose. This study examined differences between standing from an ordinary seat and standing from a low-repulsion mat using a pressure distribution measurement system (BIG-MAT) and identified parameters to determine sit-to-stand (STS) motion difficulty.Method. Ten healthy male volunteers (aged 30–38 years) participated. During STS motion from an ordinary seat and from a low-repulsion urethane mat, plantar surface pressure changes of both feet and the centre of pressure (COP) trajectory were recorded for 7 s. This series of tests was performed four times in each subject. Left and right pressure changes and COP changes were evaluated. Differences in the measurements between the low-repulsion mat and the ordinary seat were compared using the paired t-test.Results. COP changes were similar to those previously reported. Time from hindfoot peak to forefoot peak was significantly shorter with the ordinary chair than with the mat (p < 0.05). Percent change in forefoot pressure at forefoot peak and hindfoot peak (p < 0.01) and percent change in forefoot pressure at forefoot peak and stabilisation (p < 0.05) were significantly different.Conclusions. Time from hindfoot peak to forefoot peak and percent change in forefoot pressure at forefoot peak and hindfoot peak were the best indicators of STS motion difficulty.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.