Abstract

AbstractThe simplified field method of L.R. Ahuja et al. (1980) for determining hydraulic conductivity as a function of soil water suction, K(S), and the simplified field method of P.L. Libardi et al. (1980) for determining hydraulic conductivity as a function of soil water content, K(θ), were compared with the instantaneous profile method, to evaluate their suitability for estimating hydraulic conductivity of layered soil. The Ahuja method worked well on coarse and fine‐textured soils and complex soil profiles with stratification. The Libardi method worked well on coarse and fine‐textured, homogeneous materials and homogeneous parent materials underlying stratified soil materials. A calculated matching value (Ko) was used with the Libardi method. Within layered soil materials slopes of the K(θ) curves, calculated with the Libardi method, were adequate; however, calculated Ko values were often inadequate. Fit of calculated values with measured values of hydraulic conductivity could have been improved by using field‐determined Ko values.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call