Evaluation of sex-based differences in airway size and the physiological implications.

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests healthy females have significantly smaller central conducting airways than males when matched for either height or lung volume during analysis. This anatomical sex-based difference could impact the integrative response to exercise. Our review critically evaluates the literature on direct and indirect techniques to measure central conducting airway size and their limitations. We present multiple sources highlighting the difference between male and female central conducting airway size in both pediatric and adult populations. Following the discussion of measurement techniques and results, we discuss the functional implications of these differences in central conducting airway size, including work of breathing, oxygen cost of breathing, and how these impacts will continue into elderly populations. We then discuss a range of topics for the future direction of airway differences and the benefits they could provide to both healthy and diseased populations. Specially, these sex-differences in central conducting airway size could result in different aerosol deposition or how lung disease manifests. Finally, we detail emerging techniques that uniquely allow for high-resolution imaging to be paired with detailed physiological measures.