Abstract
On-demand acquisition of computational power from remote providers is the basic motivation of Grid Computing and Service Oriented Computing in general. Both concepts propose to eliminate inefficiencies in enterprises' IT infrastructure, reduce costs and increase flexibility. However, participants waive control and risk non-availability at runtime. An important phase in the procurement process is the selection of a provider out of a candidate list. This article compares two approaches for service selection. In a centralized service selection concept, a resource broker selects and assigns partners, while a coordinator-free approach uses bilateral negotiations to build pairs. A network simulation analyzes allocation results using technical and economic metrics, and shows the decentralized approach's higher adaptiveness to changing network dynamics and service instance density.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.