Abstract
This study assesses the impact of permitting unrestricted access to requests for soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) analysis in screening for iron deficiency (ID). Biochemical data including sTfR, serum ferritin (sFn), transferrin saturation, zinc protoporphyrins (ZPP) and also erythrocyte indices are used to highlight the differences between hospital (H) and general practitioner (GP) patient groups. A significantly higher number of abnormal sFn values (40%) over abnormal sTfR values (25%) occurred in GP patients. This trend was reversed in the H patient group where high sTfR values predominated. Consequently, screening with sFn, exclusively, missed ID (sTfR > 28.1 nmol/l) in 5% of GP patients and in 20% of H patients. Some 40% of H patients had elevated CRP values (CRP > 10 mg/l) indicating inflammatory disease, however, ZPP was more efficient than CRP at screening the validity of normal sFn values in the group. Unrestricted access to sTfR, sFn and ZPP analyses should expedite diagnosis in all patients, particularly H patients, but may be costly. The high specificity (>90%) of the mean cell haemoglobin for ID may be under-utilized diagnostically.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
