Evaluation of serological assays for diagnosis of onchocercosis.

Abstract

Microscopic analysis of skin snips is the most widely used diagnostic technique for onchocercosis in endemic countries. The invasive nature and low sensitivity of that procedure has called for alternative diagnostic methods for this disease. Presently, serological assays detecting filariosis in general are available for routine analysis. However, serological assays specific for onchocercosis are still not universally available. We have evaluated the performance of a dot blot assay (DBA) as a potential method for specific detection of onchocercosis. The DBA, which detects IgG, as compared with 2 IgG4-immunoblot assays, all employing Onchocerca volvulus antigen. Furthermore, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and an immunofluorescence assay (IFA) based on antigens from Acanthocheilonema viteae and Brugia malayi, respectively, were included in the comparison. Samples from microfilariae-positive patients and negative controls from the onchocercosis-endemic country Ghana were analysed. The DBA was significantly more sensitive and specific than the IgG4-assays and the ELISA, respectively. Furthermore, the anti-filarial Ig was increased in patients 1 month post-ivermectin treatment. Sera from patients with suspected filariosis from different parts of the world were analysed using DBA, ELISA and IFA. Patients responding positively in the DBA (12%) had clinical symptoms compatible with onchocercosis whereas those positive in ELISA and IFA (53% and 48%, respectively) had various clinical symptoms. These results indicate that the DBA is more specific than and as sensitive as the ELISA and the IFA presently used for the diagnosis of onchocercosis.