Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Composite Restorations Bond on Primary Canines: An In Vitro Study.

Abstract

Background and purpose The aesthetic requirements for the restoration of the primary anterior teeth of both the child and his parents increased recently, especially with the presence of materials with good mechanical properties capable of giving a good aesthetic shape. However, the challenge remains in the possibility of applying these materials to primary teeth, where the child's cooperation and ability to keep their mouth open during the completion of the restoration is an important challenge for the dentist. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the bonding of self-adhesive composite by studying the microleakage in primary canines. Materials and methods The studied sample consisted of 60 extracted primary canines that were divided into three equal groups (n=20) according to the type of restoration: group 1 (experimental) - self-adhesive composite alone, group 2 (experimental) - self-adhesive composite with selective enamel etching, and group 3 (control) - conventional composite with the self-etching bond and selective enamel etching. A Class V cavity was prepared at the cementoenamel junction, 2 mm deep and 1 mm in diameter. In this way, the gingival wall is dentine, while the incisal wall is enamel-dentine. Restorations were placed according to the group to which the tooth belongs. After that, all teeth were subjected to 500 cycles of thermocycling. Then, a methylene blue dye microleakage test was performed, and longitudinal sections of the teeth were made and studied under x20 magnification using a stereo microscope. Results In the gingival wall, the scores of microleakage in the conventional composite group after selective etching were lower than those of the self-adhesive composite groups, with a statistically significant difference. While in the incisal wall, there were no statistically significant differences in the frequencies of the scores of microleakage between the three groups. Conclusions Within the limitations of this study, the conventional composite bonded better to enameland dentine than self-adhesive composite resin applied alone or after selective enamel etching. The bonding of the self-adhesive composite was lower than that of the conventional composite, and it is not recommended to use it in Class V restorations of primary anterior teeth.