Abstract

The increasing demand for animal protein by the growing world population intensifies the exploration of novel feed sources. This study evaluated the nutritional value of six intact seaweed species (i.e. the brown species Saccharina latissima, Laminaria digitata, and Ascophyllum nodossum, the red species Palmaria palmata, and Chondrus crispus and green species Ulva lactuca), collected from the coast of Ireland, Scotland and France as an ingredient for animal feed. The nutrient composition, in vitro digestibility, and in vitro gas production simulating rumen fermentation, were determined.The nutrient contents (g/kg dry matter), both between and within species, were highly variable, ranging from 45–248 for crude protein, 351–691 for non-starch polysaccharides, and 173–445 for ash. Overall, the brown seaweeds had the highest non-starch polysaccharides content, whereas samples of the red and green seaweeds had an amino acid content up to 265 g/kg dry matter. All samples had a substantial non-protein nitrogen fraction, varying from 0.12–0.29 of nitrogen. The fibre fractions of brown seaweeds showed different properties than land-based plants, as illustrated by a lower analysed neutral detergent fibre than acid detergent fibre content. The ileal organic matter and nitrogen digestibility, as well as the total tract organic matter digestibility (mean digestibility coefficients: 0.81, 0.89 and 0.88, respectively) were lower for all seaweeds compared to soybean meal (digestibility coefficients: 0.84, 0.98 and 0.97, respectively). S. latissima, L digitata, P. palmata and U. lactuca had a higher maximum gas production than alfalfa, but lower than sugar beet pulp. Based on the protein content and amino acid-pattern, intact P. palmata and U. lactuca would be a valuable protein source for farm animals, with the high non-starch polysaccharides and non-protein nitrogen contents and a low in vitro digestibility potentially limiting their use as a feed ingredient for monogastric species. The fermentability of L. digitata, S. latissima and P. palmata indicate that these intact seaweeds may have a higher nutritional value in ruminants. The high ash content in all seaweed species hampers the use of intact seaweed for both ruminants and monogastrics. Extraction of protein and other favourable components, while reducing the ash content, seems an important step towards seaweed inclusion in animal diets. Further identification and characterisation of seaweed polysaccharides is required to understand and improve the digestibility of seaweed fractions.

Highlights

  • The expected population growth to 9.7 billion in 2050 (United Nations, 2017) coupled with increased living standards and urbanisation are important drivers for the expected global increase in meat, egg and milk consumption in the decades (Boland et al, 2013)

  • This study evaluated the nutritional value of six intact seaweed species, collected from the coast of Ireland, Scotland and France as an ingredient for animal feed

  • Based on the protein content and amino acid-pattern, intact P. palmata and U. lactuca would be a valuable protein source for farm animals, with the high non-starch polysaccharides and non-protein nitrogen contents and a low in vitro digestibility potentially limiting their use as a feed ingredient for monogastric species

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The expected population growth to 9.7 billion in 2050 (United Nations, 2017) coupled with increased living standards and urbanisation are important drivers for the expected global increase in meat, egg and milk consumption in the decades (Boland et al, 2013). Concomitant with this increase is the increase in demand for feed ingredients and as such the development of novel sources of biomass for feed ingredient production. The extension of marine biomass production by wild harvest and large scale cultivation of seaweed could significantly contribute to biomass production for feed as well as food. Detailed knowledge of the nutritive value of seaweed for feed is, hitherto lacking with only a few studies reporting in vitro, in situ or in vivo digestibility of seaweed

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call