Abstract

Public health initiatives that include shelter-in-place orders are expensive and unpopular. Demonstrating the success of these initiatives is essential to justify their systemic or individual cost. To examine the association of a shelter-in-place order with lower rates of seasonal respiratory viral activity. This cohort study with interrupted time series analysis obtained monthly counts of respiratory virus testing results at UC Davis Health from August 1, 2014, to July 31, 2020. Patients of all ages underwent testing conducted by the laboratory at UC Davis Health, a referral center for a 65 000-square-mile area that includes 33 counties and more than 6 million Northern California residents. A statewide shelter-in-place order was instituted on March 19, 2020, restricting residents to their homes except for traveling for essential activities. Large social gatherings were prohibited, schools were closed, and nonessential personnel worked remotely. Those who had to leave their homes were mandated to wear face masks, engage in frequent handwashing, and maintain physical distancing. Positivity rates of common respiratory viruses within the community served by UC Davis Health. A total of 46 128 tests for viral respiratory pathogens over a 6-year period were included in the analysis. For the postexposure period (March 25-July 31), approximately 168 positive test results occurred for the studied organisms in the 2020 virus year, a positivity rate of 9.88 positive results per 100 tests that was much lower than the positivity rate of 29.90 positive results per 100 tests observed for this date range in the previous 5 virus years. In contrast, the positivity rates were similar for the preexposure time frame (August 1-March 24) in the 2020 virus year and for the same time periods in the 5 previous years (30.40 vs 33.68 positive results per 100 tests). In the regression analyses, statistically significant decreases in viral activity were observed in the postexposure period for influenza (93% decrease; incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.07; 95% CI, 0.02-0.33) and for rhinovirus or enterovirus (81% decrease; IRR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09-0.39) infections. Lower rates of postexposure viral activity were seen for respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenzavirus, coronaviruses, and adenoviruses; however, these associations were not statistically significant. Using interrupted time series analysis of testing for viral respiratory pathogens, this study found that statistically significant lower rates of common community respiratory viruses appeared to be associated with a shelter-in-place order during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Highlights

  • The 2019-2020 respiratory virus season was like no other in human history, with the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its circulation alongside common respiratory viruses

  • Statistically significant decreases in viral activity were observed in the postexposure period for influenza (93% decrease; incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.07; 95% CI, 0.02-0.33) and for rhinovirus or enterovirus (81% decrease; IRR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09-0.39) infections

  • Using interrupted time series analysis of testing for viral respiratory pathogens, this study found that statistically significant lower rates of common community respiratory viruses appeared to be associated with a shelter-in-place order during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The 2019-2020 respiratory virus season was like no other in human history, with the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its circulation alongside common respiratory viruses. On March 19, 2020, California governor Gavin Newsom issued a statewide shelter-in-place order.[1] Under this order, all residents were to remain at home, only leaving to engage in essential activities. As part of this directive, nonessential personnel worked remotely, large social gatherings and worship services were canceled, and California schools were closed. Essential workers and consumers leaving their homes were mandated to wear face masks, engage in frequent handwashing, and maintain a 6-foot distance from people outside their household.[1] The March 19 stay-at-home order remained in effect through the summer and fall of 2020, with travel permissible only for health care needs; food procurement; outdoor exercise or recreation; outdoor museum visits; and activities at open, low-risk businesses and workplaces for which telework was not possible, including retail, manufacturing, and offices

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.