Abstract
Sampling bias was investigated in New Zealand farmed king salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) at the end of a feed trial. Two sampling techniques - a non-lethal manual assessment (MA) and a lethal hook and line (HL), were evaluated for the representativity of their samples, with regard to two performance indicators, weight and skin health. Both sampling techniques assessed (MA n = 60, HL n = 4) were biased when compared to the analysis of all the fish in each pen. However, MA samples were biased towards fish with better skin health and higher weight (+ 0.20 kg), while HL selected fish with poorer skin health than the pen population average and lower Fulton's Condition Factor (− 0.25) than MA samples. Our results emphasised the significance of understanding sampling bias so research interpretation is correct.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
