Abstract

The field of metabolomics generally lacks standardized methods for the preparation of samples prior to analysis. This is especially true for metabolomics of reef-building corals, where the handful of studies that were published employ a range of sample preparation protocols. The utilization of metabolomics may prove essential in understanding coral biology in the face of increasing environmental threats, and an optimized method for preparing coral samples for metabolomics analysis would aid this cause. The current study evaluates three important steps during sample processing of stony corals: (i) metabolite extraction, (ii) metabolism preservation, and (iii) subsampling. Results indicate that a modified Bligh and Dyer extraction is more reproducible across multiple coral species compared to methyl tert-butyl ether and methanol extractions, while a methanol extraction is superior for feature detection. Additionally, few differences were detected between spectra from frozen or lyophilized coral samples. Finally, extraction of entire coral nubbins increased feature detection, but decreased throughput and was more susceptible to subsampling error compared to a novel tissue powder subsampling method. Overall, we recommend the use of a modified Bligh and Dyer extraction, lyophilized samples, and the analysis of brushed tissue powder for the preparation of reef-building coral samples for 1H NMR metabolomics.

Highlights

  • The ecological and economic importance of coral reefs is well described, as these ecosystems provide a majority of the ocean’s biodiversity and productivity [1,2]

  • The metabolite extraction methods tested here were all used in previous metabolomics studies to varying degrees (e.g., References [36,50,51,52,53]) and each method possesses specific considerations, making them differentially useful depending on the sample type and the goals of a particular study

  • Methanol extraction was proposed as a method to maximize metabolite extraction for non-targeted metabolomics of stony corals [36]

Read more

Summary

H-NMR-Based Metabolomics

Marine Science and Nautical Training Academy (MANTA), 520 Folly Rd., Charleston, SC 29412, USA. Received: 20 December 2018; Accepted: 10 February 2019; Published: 13 February 2019

Introduction
Extraction Method Comparison
H NMR reveals similar peakpeak coverage and intensities for all three
Metabolism Preservation Comparison
Subsampling Method Comparison
Selection of Final Recommended Workflow
Validation of Recommended Sample Preparation Workflow for Stony Corals
Representative
Sample
Metrics for Selecting Sample Preparation Methods
Bligh and Dyer Extraction
MTBE Extraction
Methanol Extraction
Nubbin Method
Tissue Powder Method
Statistical Analysis
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.