Abstract
We present an evaluation of retransmission strategies over local area networks. Expressions are derived for the expectation and the variance of the transmission time of the go-back-n and the selective repeat protocols in the presence of errors. These are compared to the expressions for blast with full retransmission on error (BFRE) derived by Zwaenepoel [Zwa 85]. We conclude that go-back-n performs almost as well as selective repeat and is very much simpler to implement while BFRE is stable only for a limited range of messages sizes and error rates. We also present a variant of BFRE which optimally checkpoints the transmission of a large message. This is shown to overcome the instability of ordinary BFRE. It has a simple state machine and seems to take full advantage of the low error rates of local area networks. We further investigate go-back-n by generalizing the analysis to an upper layer transport protocol, which is likely to encounter among other things, variable delays due to protocol overhead, multiple connections, process switches and operating system scheduling priorities.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.