Abstract

Early diagnosis is important for the clinical management of diseases caused by dengue virus (DENV) infections. We investigated the performance of three commercially available DENV nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) using 173 acute-phase sera collected from dengue fever-suspected patients during the 2012–2013 DENV outbreak in Taiwan. The results of the NS1 RDTs were compared with those of qRT-PCR to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of the NS1 RDTs. The anti-DENV IgM and IgG RDT results were included to increase the probability of detecting acute DENV infection. The anti-DENV IgM/IgG RDT results were also compared with those of IgM/IgG captured ELISA. The sera from DENV qRT-PCR-positive patients were subjected to NS1 RDTs, as well as IgM/IgG captured ELISA. These results suggested that there was no significant difference in the sensitivities of the three commercially available DNEV NS1 RDTs; the SD NS1 RDT results showed the highest agreement with the qRT-PCR reference results, followed in order by the Bio-Rad and CTK NS1 RDT results when the specificity was considered. Inclusion of the IgM or IgG RDT results increased the likelihood of diagnosing either a primary or secondary DENV infection. NS1 RDTs were more sensitive for the detection of primary infections than secondary infections, related to DENV viremia levels determined by qRT-PCR. These results suggested that anti-DENV antibodies reduced the sensitivity of NS1 rapid tests. We also analyzed the sensitivity for the detection of different DENV serotypes, and the results suggested that the NS1 RDTs used in this study were valuable for rapid screening of acute DENV infection with DENV-1, DENV-2 and DENV-3. Our results suggest that the NS1 RDT is a good alternative to qRT-PCR analysis for timely dengue disease management and prevention in dengue-endemic regions where medical resources are lacking or during large dengue outbreaks. However, the relatively low sensitivity for DENV-4 might miss the detection of DENV-4-infected cases.

Highlights

  • Dengue is an arthropod-borne acute infectious human disease predominantly distributed in tropical and subtropical countries worldwide, and it is considered the most important arboviral disease in humans [1]

  • The confirmed Dengue fever (DF) cases were defined by virtue of the positive results of dengue virus (DENV) qRT-PCR (n = 136), while those with negative qRT-PCR results were classified as having other febrile illnesses (OFIs) (n = 37)

  • The high sensitivity of the three nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) investigated in this study might be because 92% of the sera were collected from patients with primary infections. These results suggested that the sensitivity was decreased when the NS1 RDT was applied to the convalescent phase samples or to samples collected from patients with secondary infections

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dengue is an arthropod-borne acute infectious human disease predominantly distributed in tropical and subtropical countries worldwide, and it is considered the most important arboviral disease in humans [1]. DENV is a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA virus that belongs to the genus Flavivirus, family Flaviviridae. It is estimated that 390 million DENV infections occur annually, and approximately 2.5 billion people are at risk worldwide. The threat of dengue has grown over the past five decades and continues to increase due to the vast amount of intercontinental travel, travel between urban and rural areas and global warming, resulting in the wide spread of viral vectors [1]. The dengue viral RNA genome (~11 kilobases) encodes seven nonstructural and three structural proteins [2]. The clinical outcomes include asymptomatic virus infection, undifferentiated fever, self-limiting DF, life-threatening dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) and dengue shock syndrome (DSS) featuring severe plasma loss characterized by hemostasis abnormalities and increased vascular permeability [3] or dengue, dengue with warning signs, and severe dengue based on the revised WHO case definition [4]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call