Abstract
The aim of the study was to compare image quality of two different systems based on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Primary and secondary reconstructions were performed from data sets of the Siremobil Iso-C(3D) (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) and the NewTom 9000 (NIM s.r.l., Verona, Italy) using a dried human skull. Using defined anatomical structures, image quality was analysed by 10 examiners using a ranking scale. Regarding image quality there was no statistically significant difference between the two systems compared. The preliminary results show, that imaging of the facial skeleton using the Siremobil Iso-C(3D) can be performed with a quality comparable to the NewTom 9000.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
