Abstract

Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical chemistry and hematology laboratory performance using six sigma metrics. Methods Clinical chemistry data and hematology data were analyzed from Bungoma Referral Hospital. Five parameters from renal and liver function tests were studied over a period of 6 months (December 2016 to May 2017). Data from IQC and EQA participation were used. The analytes were plasma creatinine, aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), total serum protein, and total and direct bilirubin. Hematology parameters, namely white blood cell count (WBC), red blood cell count (RBC), and hemoglobin (Hb) levels, were studied. Data from IQC and EQA participation were used. Sigma metrics was calculated using total allowable error as per CLIA recommendations. Bias was calculated from HUQAS EQA participation while coefficient of variation was calculated from IQC data collected during the abovementioned months. Results Clinical chemistry had sigma metrics below 3; the highest sigma value was 2.01 while the lowest sigma value was 0.85. Hematological parameters had sigma levels above 3. The highest sigma value was 7.21 while the lowest sigma value was 3.87. Only one level of sigma was below 4. Conclusion Clinical chemistry analytes had sigma levels less than 3; method performance improvement with stringent internal quality control and correct setting of control limits need to be applied. Application of sigma metrics in addition to daily internal quality control can identify analytical deficits and improvement in clinical laboratories. Most hematological parameters had sigma levels above 3. The highest sigma value was 7.21 while the lowest sigma value was 3.87. Only one level of sigma was below 4.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call