Evaluation of psycho-social distress in patients treated in a community-based oncology group practice in Germany

Abstract

e20577 Background: Systematic evaluation of psycho-social distress in oncology outpatients is an important issue. Therefore we assessed feasibility and benefit of standardized routine screening using the Distress Thermometer (DT) and the Problem List (PL) in daily practice. Methods: All patients attending the practice between July and September 2008 were administered the DT and the PL. Patients were classified into the disease groups solid tumors, hematological neoplasms, benign hematological diseases and other non-malignant diseases. The individual treatment phase was evaluated additionally. Participants in a mammography screening programme were assessed as a control group. 500 randomly selected patients were sent a feedback-form to describe how they experienced the DT's influence on the doctor-patient-communication. Results: The 1,446 patients reported an average distress level of 4.7 with 37% indicating a distress level > 5. Patients with other non-malignant diseases (81% autoimmune diseases or hereditary hemochromatosis) showed the highest average distress level of 5.2. Regarding the treatment phases, the most distressed patients were patients who just learned about their diagnosis of relapsed or metastatic disease (6.4), patients receiving Best Supportive Care (5.4) and patients receiving adjuvant anti-hormonal therapy (5.4). The most frequently indicated problems causing distress were exhaustion/fatigue (49%), pain (44%), impaired mobility (41%) and sleep disorders (39%) respectively. Breast cancer patients stated a distress level of 5.2. The average distress level in 474 mammography screening participants was 3.3. 37% of 190 patients who returned the feedback-form indicated that the DT and PL were useful tools to speak to their doctor about their distress more precisely. 38% felt better than usual after this conversation. Conclusions: The study shows that cancer patients do not necessarily show higher distress than patients with severe non-malignant diseases. The problems patients most frequently indicate as distressing are somatic disorders. DT and PL are applicable for routine screening in an outpatient setting. Physicians as well as patients stated that the use of the DT improved the quality of their communication. No significant financial relationships to disclose.