Abstract

Abstract Nanofiltration (NF) has been used as the default sulfate removal process in platforms to treat seawater for water flooding. Seawater is generally pretreated by chlorination and cartridge filters to reduce fouling of the membranes; however, this pretreatment is insufficient to provide water quality high enough to maintain the productivity of the NF membranes. In this study, the performances of two different pretreatment routes were evaluated. Microfiltration (MF) was evaluated as a replacement for cartridge filters, and the advanced oxidation process UV/H2O2 was evaluated as an additional stage of pretreatment upstream of the cartridge filters. The permeability of the NF membranes after 12 h of seawater sulfate removal in a bench system was 4.4 L·h−1·m−2·bar−1 when the UV/H2O2 process was adopted as the pretreatment and 2.9 L·h−1·m−2·bar−1 when the MF process was adopted, compared to 1.6 L·h−1·m−2·bar−1 achieved for the pretreatment with the cartridge filter alone. These results indicate that NF membrane fouling was significantly higher when seawater was pretreated only by the cartridge filter in comparison to both proposed pretreatments. An economic analysis showed that both systems are economically viable and can potentially reduce the operational costs of the NF sulfate removal process on platforms.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call